At long last I finally saw Sex and the City. We went on Friday night, after work. Had a quick dinner and caught the 6:30 showing, which was still fairly full! As mentioned earlier, I had always enjoyed the TV show, even though I don't consider myself a die-hard fanatic. I expected to enjoy the movie but nothing more. Like Jenna, however, I found myself enjoying it a LOT more than I anticipated! I can definitely see how some people would go back to the theaters and watch it again!
I thought the most interesting part of the movie was the way some of the characters developed a bit from their usual personalities in the TV show (again, this is coming from someone who's watched maybe only 1/4 of all the episodes). Like Charlotte getting feisty in defending her jilted friend. And Miranda revealing that underneath that cynical, hard-nosed persona she does have a soft heart after all. And Samantha-- doing her best to keep from straying!
That, then, got me thinking about the brief commentary between me and Jenna on the previous entries, about how the show's characters as a whole pretty much encompass the entire spectrum of personalities. The average person would find it hard to identify with just ONE character, but it's easy for us to find elements of ourselves amongst 2 or 3 of the women. For me, it's Carrie's cautious optimism. Miranda's drive. Charlotte's innocent outlook (shut up) on life, and her fashion style.
The other day, while watching "Friends" on TV, the ensuing discussion about who our favorite character was got me thinking about WHY we had our individual favorites-- and I think it mostly has to do with how much we can relate to the character. How much of ourselves (that we don't hate) we see in him/her. And the same thing happens: there is more than one. Invariably, I'll say: "My favorite is X. But I also like Y. And then there's Z!" and before you know it I've rattled off more than half the cast. I love Chandler's style of humor and down-to-earthness (is that a word??). I am Monica's twin when it comes to obsessing over order and cleanliness. I can relate to Phoebe's bluntness and Ross's geekish tendencies. A single favorite is hard to name because I can relate to different parts of so many.
And... I guess it's that way in real life, too. Your friends are hardly your clones. You have a few things in common, but some things different as well. Ultimately, the differences are a good thing-- it'd get pretty boring hanging out with a bunch of your "twins", wouldn't it? I think about that in terms of those of you who are reading this blog right now. At first, our one thing in common was the thing that we had in common with hundreds, thousands of other people-- Grab.com or UCSB. Gradually we came to discover more. Similar interests/hobbies. Tastes in music and movies. Circumstances. Goals. Philosophies.
Then the differences also became apparent. I don't like cats. Some of you own them. I hate hiking, camping and anything outdoorsy. Some of you live for it. I favor country music. Precious few of you do. I'm too weary for the heavy-drinking scene. Some of you could still drink me under the table. We have different outlooks on lifestyles, family, work, and money. And despite the differences, we get along as well as the women of "Sex and the City" and the sextet of "Friends". Our similarities bring us together, our differences keep the friendships interesting. That really brings out the positive meaning of "diversity", doesn't it?
Just as an afterthought... we could have our very own sitcom/soap opera just based on our lives together! The stories we could tell! What should we call our show? ;-)
(originally posted at: http://www.myspace.com/hellykwee/blog/404486978)